From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: strange case of "if ((a & b))" |
Date: | 2021-09-07 05:59:58 |
Message-ID: | YTb/3iLjBg0Te6hI@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 07:11:10PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I revised the patch based on these comments. I think my ternary patch already
> excluded the cases that test something other than a boolean.
In 0002, everything is a boolean expression except for
SpGistPageStoresNulls() and GistPageIsLeaf(). So that's a good
cleanup overall.
- pathnode->parallel_aware = parallel_workers > 0 ? true : false;
+ pathnode->parallel_aware = parallel_workers > 0;
I also prefer that we keep the parenthesis for such things. That's
more readable and easier to reason about.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2021-09-07 06:00:01 | Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1 |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-09-07 05:58:24 | Re: [BUG] Failed Assertion in ReorderBufferChangeMemoryUpdate() |