Re: elog.c query_id support vs shutdown

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: elog.c query_id support vs shutdown
Date: 2021-08-19 07:05:26
Message-ID: YR4CtuOqMyBO31FL@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 11:29:24AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Ah indeed! This was quite a long thread so I didn't try to see when
> that changed. I also now realize that I made a typo in the patch
> where I s/loop/look/ which was then changed to s/look/lock/. The
> comment should be something like:

The thread of this open item is now idle for 10 days and there does
not seem to be a lot of progress. Bruce, this is assigned to you.
Are you planning to look at it?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-08-19 07:09:12 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-08-19 06:51:38 Re: pg_veryfybackup can fail with a valid backup for TLI > 1