Re: Replace l337sp34k in comments.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replace l337sp34k in comments.
Date: 2021-07-30 00:48:47
Message-ID: YQNMbziuSSquaI9e@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 09:46:59AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> That 'feels' right to me.
>
> Though in code, possibly it would be better to just use 'up-to-date' in code
> for consistency and to make the it easier to grep?

The change in llvmjit_expr.c may not look like an adjective though,
which I admit can be a bit confusing. Still that does not look
completely wrong to me either.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-07-30 01:03:55 Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)
Previous Message John Naylor 2021-07-30 00:34:01 Re: A qsort template