Re: More time spending with "delete pending"

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: More time spending with "delete pending"
Date: 2021-07-06 08:33:35
Message-ID: YOQVX1f9/2s1ct6W@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 06:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> I believe that the patch attached to [1] should fix this issue. The
> patch still applies to master and makes the demotest (attached to [2])
> pass. Also I've prepared a trivial patch that makes pgwin32_open() use
> the original stat() function (as in the proposed change for _pgstat64()).

Hmm. Knowing that _pgfstat64() has some special handling related to
files pending for deletion, do we really need that on HEAD?

> - struct stat st;
> + struct microsoft_native_stat st;
>
> - if (stat(fileName, &st) != 0)
> + if (microsoft_native_stat(fileName, &st) != 0)
> {
> pg_usleep(100000);
> loops++;

This change looks like a good idea for the WIN32 emulation of open(),
taken independently.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-07-06 08:47:34 Re: ECPG doesn't compile CREATE AS EXECUTE properly.
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-07-06 08:29:27 Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE