Re: Can a child process detect postmaster death when in pg_usleep?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can a child process detect postmaster death when in pg_usleep?
Date: 2021-07-06 08:07:53
Message-ID: YOQPWVueHM6dalt1@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 12:42:21PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> I'm sorry to say that I didn't get what was said above. We reset the
> latch after we come out of WaitLatch but not before going to wait. And
> the reason to have WL_LATCH_SET, is to exit the wait loop if MyLatch
> is set for that process because of other SetLatch events. Am I missing
> something here?

Did you test the patch with post_auth_delay and a backend connection,
making sure that the delay gets correctly applied? I did, and that
was not working here.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-07-06 08:20:46 Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-07-06 08:04:15 Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE