Re: ECPG doesn't compile CREATE AS EXECUTE properly.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ECPG doesn't compile CREATE AS EXECUTE properly.
Date: 2021-07-06 11:10:15
Message-ID: YOQ6F8Kc/wgzzfjs@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 05:47:34PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> More accurately, I didn't come up with the way to split out some of
> the rule-components in a rule out as another rule using the existing
> infrastructure.
>
> [...]
>
> Then add the following component to the rule "stmt".

I see. That sounds interesting as solution, and consistent with the
existing cursor queries. The ECPG parser is not that advanced, and we
may not really need to make it more complicated with sub-clause
handling like INEs. So I'd be rather in favor of what you are
describing here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2021-07-06 11:18:18 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Japin Li 2021-07-06 11:04:25 Re: Why is XLOG_FPI_FOR_HINT always need backups?