Re: Disable WAL logging to speed up data loading

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com" <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com" <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disable WAL logging to speed up data loading
Date: 2021-07-05 01:31:54
Message-ID: YOJhCre+SolEpBzB@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jul 04, 2021 at 11:02:01AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Rather than RfC, the appropriate status seems like it should be
> Rejected, as otherwise it's just encouraging someone to ultimately waste
> their time rebasing and updating the patch when it isn't going to ever
> actually be committed.

Yes, agreed with that.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message zhangjie2@fujitsu.com 2021-07-05 01:34:58 [Patch] change the return value of PQsendFlushRequest
Previous Message Floris Van Nee 2021-07-04 22:28:25 RE: visibility map corruption