Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Date: 2021-06-15 03:01:00
Message-ID: YMgX7Mqv/Ogo4i4y@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:49:21AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:36 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> OK, but I need more information on how users will see a difference based
>> on this commit:

+1. That would be good to have in the release notes.

> I think that since with this commit the server on Windows can handle a
> file over 4GB, COPY FROM loading data from an over 4GB file and
> pg_dump dumping a large table work now.

Segment files or WAL files larger than 4GB also gain from that.
Anything for which we may finish to do a stat() on benefits from this
change if running on Windows. For pg_dump, a workaround in PG <= 13
was to use --no-sync as the stat() failure came from files with a size
larger than 4GB. That's rather sad as that means sacrifying
durability for more usability :(
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-06-15 03:42:06 Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-15 02:57:08 Improving the isolationtester: fewer failures, less delay