Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size?
Date: 2021-06-14 00:27:16
Message-ID: YMaiZMnfpwXg/Wqx@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:09:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 11:32:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In the meantime I'm +1 for dropping this logic from VACUUM FULL.
>> I don't even want to spend enough more time on it to confirm the
>> different overhead measurements that have been reported.
>
> Agreed. It looks like we are heading toward doing just that for this
> release.

Hearing nothing, done this way.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com 2021-06-14 00:42:12 RE: pgbench bug candidate: negative "initial connection time"
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-06-14 00:24:14 Re: Fix DROP TABLESPACE on Windows with ProcSignalBarrier?