Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
Date: 2021-06-09 02:21:52
Message-ID: YMAlwOCxkNRk0YEo@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:17:35AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Any objections to making these new tests line up with the rest?
>
> No objection, as the output is still way under 80 characters.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-06-09 02:21:55 Re: Logical replication keepalive flood
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-06-09 02:17:35 Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names