Re: Alias collision in `refresh materialized view concurrently`

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Mathis Rudolf <mathis(dot)rudolf(at)credativ(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alias collision in `refresh materialized view concurrently`
Date: 2021-06-03 06:56:25
Message-ID: YLh9GUASgaPF8Hbd@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:44:45PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Thanks.The changes with that approach are very minimal. PSA v5 and let
> me know if any more changes are needed.

Simple enough, so applied and back-patched. It took 8 years for
somebody to complain about the current aliases, so that should be
enough to get us close to zero conflicts now. I have looked a bit to
see if anybody would use this naming convention, but could not find a
trace, FWIW.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-06-03 07:26:49 Failures with gcd functions with GCC snapshots GCC and -O3 (?)
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-06-03 06:51:46 Re: Fixup some appendStringInfo and appendPQExpBuffer calls