Re: Re: Parallel scan with SubTransGetTopmostTransaction assert coredump

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pengchengliu <pengchengliu(at)tju(dot)edu(dot)cn>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Parallel scan with SubTransGetTopmostTransaction assert coredump
Date: 2021-05-24 04:50:13
Message-ID: YKswhdCNo6gwn2w2@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:04:37PM +1000, Greg Nancarrow wrote:
> Keep cfbot happy, use the PG14 patch as latest.

This stuff is usually very tricky. Do we have a way to reliably
reproduce the report discussed here?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-05-24 05:03:12 Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-05-24 04:47:09 Re: Race condition in recovery?