From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Typo in README.barrier |
Date: | 2021-05-18 00:04:11 |
Message-ID: | YKMEe4zpM+y7isbt@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 06:37:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Generally it's considered poor form to push any inessential patches
> during a release window (which I'd define roughly as 48 hours before
> the wrap till after the tag is applied). It complicates the picture
> for the final round of buildfarm testing, and if we have to do a
> re-wrap then we're faced with the question of whether to back out
> the patch.
>
> In this case, it being just a README, I agree there's no harm done.
> But we've been burnt by "low risk" patches before, so I'd tend to
> err on the side of caution during a release window.
Yes, I've had this experience once in the past. So I tend to just
wait until the tag is pushed as long as it is not critical for the
release.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-05-18 00:26:57 | Re: pgsql: Move tablespace path re-creation from the makefiles to pg_regres |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-05-17 22:47:01 | Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION? |