Re: Extensions not dumped when --schema is used

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions not dumped when --schema is used
Date: 2021-04-15 07:58:03
Message-ID: YHfyC9nwRAZq31L4@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:31:15AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> The name "without_extension_explicit_schema" arose because that test differs
> from the "without_extension" test by adding --schema=public. The test named
> "without_extension_implicit_schema" differs from "without_extension" by adding
> --schema=regress_pg_dump_schema, so the word "implicit" feels not-descriptive
> of the test. I recommend picking a different name. Other than that, the
> change looks good.

Thanks for the review. I have picked up "internal" instead, as
that's the schema created within the extension itself, and applied the
patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-04-15 08:11:42 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-15 07:48:51 Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output