Re: Tiny update to pg_stat_statements documentation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tiny update to pg_stat_statements documentation
Date: 2021-04-21 03:11:45
Message-ID: YH+X8WN25dAbv1Kr@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:46:59AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> +1, it looks good to me.

Cool, thanks for confirming. The top of the docs have IMO enough
details about the requirements around compute_query_id and third-part
modules, so we are done here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-21 03:18:14 Re: Table refer leak in logical replication
Previous Message Andy Fan 2021-04-21 02:55:29 prerequisites of pull_up_sublinks