Re: test runner (was Re: SQL-standard function body)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: test runner (was Re: SQL-standard function body)
Date: 2021-04-08 23:39:46
Message-ID: YG+UQj3ldZMplyYE@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:50:39AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Obviously all very far from being ready, but this seemed like a good
> enough excuse to mention it ;)

This is nice. Are there any parallelism capabilities?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul A Jungwirth 2021-04-08 23:40:51 Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-04-08 23:25:49 Re: Lots of incorrect comments in nodeFuncs.c