From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_collation_actual_version() ERROR: cache lookup failed for collation 123 |
Date: | 2021-02-22 07:27:17 |
Message-ID: | YDNc1eyZMNCpwE1z@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:34:22PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:15 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Could you just add a test with pg_collation_current_version(0)?
>
> Done.
>
>> + pg_strncasecmp("POSIX.", collcollate, 6) != 0)
>>
>> I didn't know that "POSIX." was possible.
>
> Yeah, that isn't valid on my (quite current) GNU or FreeBSD systems,
> and doesn't show up in their "locale -a" output, but I wondered about
> that theoretical possibility and googled it, and that showed that it
> does exist out there, though I don't know where/which versions,
> possibly only a long time ago. You know what, let's just forget that
> bit, it's not necessary. Removed.
>
>> While on it, I guess that you could add tab completion support for
>> CREATE COLLATION foo FROM.
>
> Good point. Added.
>
>> And shouldn't CREATE COLLATION complete
>> with the list of existing collation?
>
> Rght, fixed.
Looks good to me, thanks!
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mats Kindahl | 2021-02-22 07:33:21 | Table AM and DDLs |
Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-02-22 07:25:28 | RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...) |