From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Bug fix in initdb output |
Date: | 2021-03-02 01:23:21 |
Message-ID: | YD2TiZCYACuHjV3m@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:28:57AM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> For me it is a +1 for the change to absolute. Let's see if more people want
> to weigh in on the matter.
FWIW, I don't think that it is a good idea to come back to this
decision for *nix platforms, so I would let it as-is, and use relative
paths if initdb is called using a relative path.
The number of people using a relative path for Windows initialization
sounds rather limited to me. However, if you can write something that
makes the path printed compatible for a WIN32 terminal while keeping
the behavior consistent with other platforms, people would have no
objections to that.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-03-02 01:29:41 | Re: archive_command / pg_stat_archiver & documentation |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-03-02 01:10:20 | Re: PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds) |