From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15 |
Date: | 2023-02-01 01:53:17 |
Message-ID: | Y9nGDSgIm83FHcad@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
While browsing the buildfarm, I have noticed this failure on curcilio:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=curculio&dt=2023-02-01%2001%3A05%3A17
The test that has reported a failure is the check on the archive
module callback:
# Failed test 'check shutdown callback of shell archive module'
# at t/020_archive_status.pl line 248.
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 17.
[02:28:06] t/020_archive_status.pl ..............
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/17 subtests
Looking closer, this is a result of an assertion failure in the latch
code:
2023-02-01 02:28:05.615 CET [6961:8] LOG: received fast shutdown request
2023-02-01 02:28:05.615 CET [6961:9] LOG: aborting any active transactions
2023-02-01 02:28:05.616 CET [30681:9] LOG: process 30681 releasing ProcSignal slot 33, but it contains 0
TRAP: FailedAssertion("latch->owner_pid == MyProcPid", File: "latch.c", Line: 451, PID: 30681)
The information available in standby2.log shows that 30681 is the
startup process. I am not sure what all that means, yet.
Thoughts or comments welcome.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-02-01 01:58:46 | Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux? |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-02-01 01:44:53 | Re: pg_upgrade test failure |