Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: t(dot)kitynski(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings
Date: 2023-01-30 21:17:14
Message-ID: Y9gz2rRpm6VKnC0M@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:07:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:19:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> >> From time to time some spelling for given command gets obsolete, yet it is
> >> shown in the syntax on "equal rights" as other valid clauses.
>
> > We don't need to show all _supported_ syntaxes in the "Synopsis"
> > section, so we could just remove them.
>
> IIRC, there is precedent in COPY for moving obsolete alternatives
> to a separate part of the man page. I'd prefer that to just
> removing them, because then there is no documentation to help
> someone understand what an old SQL script is doing.

Yeah, I remember that with COPY. t(dot)kitynski(at)gmail(dot)com, please us that
as a guide. Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect,
which you will never be.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2023-02-02 00:52:09 1.3 Creating a database - windows 10x64
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-30 21:07:46 Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings