From: | Peter Bex <peter(dot)bex(at)bevuta(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Unique constraint error instead of serialization_failure |
Date: | 2023-01-25 12:29:11 |
Message-ID: | Y9Egl2e8STe9IiY7@mail.networkname.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:24 AM Benny Kramek <benny(at)medflyt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello, I have found an example where I expect to get a serialization failure
error, but instead receive a unique constraint error. My understanding is that
this is not supposed to happen starting with PostgreSQL version 9.6 because of
this patch:
>
> <https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=fcff8a575198478023ada8a48e13b50f70054766>
I'm also running into this bug (with both Postgres 13.7 and 15.1) and am
wondering if there's any progress on this bug, or if there is a known
workaround for it.
After explaining what I saw on IRC, "ysch" (Yaroslav Schekin) pointed
me to this wiki page: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SerializableToDo
and I was able to write a test case in my own code base to confirm this
is what I'm running into.
While fiddling with my tests, I noticed that when you REINDEX _either_
of the indexes in the testcase before starting the transactions, somehow
a serialization error is triggered instead of a uniqueness constraint
error! I verified that this also happens with the minimal testcase
provided by OP.
Of course this is not exactly a useful workaround for a production db,
but maybe it helps in finding out why this is failing the way it is?
Cheers,
Peter Bex
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-01-25 14:12:18 | Re: Minor difference in behavior between +/- |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2023-01-25 11:32:25 | BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate |