| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2023-01-19 20:56:54 |
| Message-ID: | Y8muloSZj+1JzLLq@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:50:05PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 16:23 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Is it possible to document when partition table statistics helps?
>
> I think it would be difficult to come up with an exhaustive list.
I was afraid of that. I asked only because most people assume
autovacuum handles _all_ statistics needs, but this case is not handled.
Do people even have any statistics maintenance process anymore, and if
not, how would they know they need to run a manual ANALYZE?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect,
which you will never be.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-01-19 20:56:57 | Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation |
| Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2023-01-19 20:49:30 | Re: Experiments with Postgres and SSL |