From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
Cc: | Jelte Fennema <Jelte(dot)Fennema(at)microsoft(dot)com>, "isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com" <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] Support using "all" for the db user in pg_ident.conf |
Date: | 2023-01-17 05:10:18 |
Message-ID: | Y8YtunC3vL+sfr4r@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:53:57AM +0100, Jelte Fennema wrote:
>> Perhaps it would be simpler to use copy_auth_token() in this code path
>> and always free the resulting token?
>
> I initially tried that when working on the patch, but copy_auth_token
> (surprisingly) doesn't copy the regex field into the new AuthToken.
> So we'd have to regenerate it conditionally. Making the copy
> conditional seemed just as simple code-wise, with the added
> bonus that it's not doing a useless copy.
Okay, I can live with that.
>> In the code path where system-user is a regexp, could it be better
>> to skip the replacement of \1 in the new AuthToken if pg-user is
>> itself a regexp? The compiled regexp would be the same, but it could
>> be considered as a bit confusing, as it can be thought that the
>> compiled regexp of pg-user happened after the replacement?
>
> I updated 0004 to prioritize membership checks and regexes over
> substitution of \1. I also added tests for this. Prioritizing "all" over
> substitution of \1 is not necessary, since by definition "all" does
> not include \1.
Thanks, 0003 is OK, so applied now.
0004 looks fine as well, be it for the tests (I am hesitating to tweak
things a bit here actually for the role names), the code or the docs,
still I am planning a second lookup.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-01-17 05:32:03 | Re: recovery modules |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-01-17 05:07:05 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |