| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client |
| Date: | 2023-01-17 03:32:49 |
| Message-ID: | Y8YW4cmMrZi0cWdV@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 04:48:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm slightly tempted to back-patch 002_pg_upgrade.pl so that there
> is an in-tree way to verify back-branch AdjustUpgrade.pm files.
> On the other hand, it's hard to believe that testing that in
> HEAD won't be sufficient; I doubt the back-branch copies will
> need to change much.
Backpatching 002_pg_upgrade.pl requires a bit more than the test:
there is one compatibility gotcha as of dc57366. I did not backpatch
it because nobody has complained about it until I found out about it,
but the test would require it.
By the way, thanks for your work on this stuff :)
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-01-17 03:37:07 | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2023-01-17 03:32:28 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |