Re: Lazy allocation of pages required for verifying FPI consistency

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lazy allocation of pages required for verifying FPI consistency
Date: 2023-01-13 05:20:39
Message-ID: Y8DqJ0rw/kzUwNMK@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:37:38PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 4:29 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> IMHO, it's a bit scaring to me to push down the execution stack by
>> that large size. I tend to choose the (current) possible memory
>> wasting only on startup process than digging stack deeply.
>
> +1

Indeed. I agree to leave that be.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2023-01-13 05:23:05 Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-01-13 05:05:39 Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply