Re: typos

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: typos
Date: 2023-01-03 08:41:58
Message-ID: Y7PqVj4O4PnRsWeW@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 01:03:01PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> One minor comment:
> - spoken in Belgium (BE), with a <acronym>UTF-8</acronym> character set
> + spoken in Belgium (BE), with a <acronym>UTF</acronym>-8 character set
>
> Shouldn't this be <acronym>UTF8</acronym> as we are using in func.sgml?

Yeah, I was wondering as well why this change is not worse, which is
why I left it out of 33ab0a2. There is an acronym for UTF in
acronym.sgml, which makes sense to me, but that's the only place where
this is used. To add more on top of that, the docs basically need
only UTF8, and we have three references to UTF-16, none of them using
the <acronym> markup.
--
Michael

In response to

  • Re: typos at 2023-01-03 07:33:01 from Amit Kapila

Responses

  • Re: typos at 2023-01-03 16:16:29 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michail Nikolaev 2023-01-03 08:43:54 Re: Data loss on logical replication, 12.12 to 14.5, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Previous Message David Geier 2023-01-03 08:38:20 Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?