Re: GetNewObjectId question

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GetNewObjectId question
Date: 2022-12-11 07:20:17
Message-ID: Y5WEsV1QmDUw2FWG@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:03:38PM -0800, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
> Sure. My C is pretty limited, but I think it's just the attached? I
> patterned the usage on the way this is done in CreateRole. It passes
> check-world here.

Looks OK seen from here. Thanks for the patch! I don't have much
freshness and time today, but I can get back to this thread tomorrow.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2022-12-11 09:25:48 Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions (checkAsUser)
Previous Message Maciek Sakrejda 2022-12-11 07:03:38 Re: GetNewObjectId question