From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros |
Date: | 2022-12-10 03:52:16 |
Message-ID: | Y5QCcIRaiGEDtBg0@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 09:43:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Presumably it could be silenced by removing the semicolons after
> the new macro calls:
>
> /* pg_stat_get_analyze_count */
> PG_STAT_GET_RELENTRY_INT64(analyze_count);
>
> /* pg_stat_get_autoanalyze_count */
> PG_STAT_GET_RELENTRY_INT64(autoanalyze_count);
>
> /* pg_stat_get_autovacuum_count */
> PG_STAT_GET_RELENTRY_INT64(autovacuum_count);
>
> I wondered if that would confuse pgindent, but a quick check
> says no. (The blank lines in between may be helping.)
Indeed. Will fix.
> The backslash after the last right brace means that the line
> following that is part of the macro body. This does no harm as
> long as said line is blank ... but I think it's a foot-gun
> waiting to bite somebody, because visually you'd think the macro
> ends with the brace. So I'd leave off that last backslash.
Will address this one as well for all the macro definitions. Thanks!
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-12-10 03:55:45 | Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-12-10 02:50:09 | -Wunreachable-code-generic-assoc warnings on elver |