Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths
Date: 2022-12-02 05:22:55
Message-ID: Y4mLrwaDrUEp47Ms@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 09:52:39AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> CommitFest 2022-11 is currently underway, so if you are interested
> in moving this patch forward, now would be a good time to update it.

No replies after 4 weeks, so I have marked this entry as returned
with feedback. I am still wondering what would be the best thing to
do here..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-02 05:26:31 Re: [PATCH] Add `verify-system` sslmode to use system CA pool for server cert
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-02 05:15:47 Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)