| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2022-11-28 21:53:10 |
| Message-ID: | Y4UtxuNFactg2VAv@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 01:31:39PM -0800, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:59 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > You can prepare a patch, but it unlikely to get much interest until you
> > get agreement on what the behavior should be.
>
> We discussed the approach on 2020's Unconference [0]. And there kind
> of was an agreement.
> Then I made a presentation on FOSDEM with all the details [1].
> The patch had been on commitfest since 2019 [2]. There were reviewers
> in the CF entry, and we kind of had an agreement.
> Jeff Davis proposed a similar patch [3]. And we certainly agreed about cancels.
> And now Bharath is proposing the same.
>
> We have the interest and agreement.
Okay, I was not aware we had such broad agreement.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect,
which you will never be.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-11-28 21:55:04 | Re: fixing CREATEROLE |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-11-28 21:52:42 | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 |