Re: Error-safe user functions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Date: 2022-12-05 01:17:56
Message-ID: Y41GxOW8se0b/ORw@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 06:01:33PM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> Once/If I get that in, I will be pushing to get that syntax in postgres as
> well.

If I may ask, how long would it take to know if this grammar would be
integrated in the standard or not?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-05 01:23:09 Re: mprove tab completion for ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-05 01:03:55 Re: Add LSN along with offset to error messages reported for WAL file read/write/validate header failures