Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs mailing list <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Date: 2022-11-14 13:24:34
Message-ID: Y3JBktH7QS0fVOL5@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 06:41:59PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> From the last two lines above, it is clear why it started working. The
> restart_lsn has advanced from 1039D/83825958 to 1039D/9170B010 which
> means the system no longer needs data from 000000010001039D00000083.

Sure, but how could it advance if the wal wasn't there?

Best regards,

depesz

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2022-11-14 13:33:28 Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-11-14 13:11:59 Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.