Re: Move backup-related code to xlogbackup.c/.h

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Move backup-related code to xlogbackup.c/.h
Date: 2022-10-14 08:33:14
Message-ID: Y0keygE5J0U2/ncO@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:24:41AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> However, what's most problematic about this patch is that it introduces
> a pretty serious bug, yet that bug goes unnoticed if you just run the
> builtin test suites. I only noticed because I added an elog(ERROR,
> "oops") in the area protected by ENSURE_ERROR_CLEANUP and a debug
> elog(WARNING) in the cleanup area, then examined the server log after
> the pg_basebackup test filed; but this is not very workable. I wonder
> what would be a good way to keep this in check. The naive way seems to
> be to run a pg_basebackup, have it abort partway through (how?), then
> test the server and see if forced page writes are enabled or not.

See around the bottom of 010_pg_basebackup.pl, where a combination of
IPC::Run::start('pg_basebackup') with --max-rate and
pg_terminate_backend() is able to achieve that.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-14 08:35:53 Re: Fix error message for MERGE foreign tables
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-10-14 08:24:41 Re: Move backup-related code to xlogbackup.c/.h