From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add missing meson arguments in docs |
Date: | 2023-02-22 01:57:47 |
Message-ID: | Y/V2m04KR6A0K29U@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Jelte Fennema wrote:
> The -Dcassert and -Db_coverage of the meson build didn't show in the
> docs that they needed to be passed true or false. All other options
> specified the arguments they expected. This patch fixes that.
Indeed, values have to be specified after the equal sign of each
option, so applied what you are suggesting here.
-Db_coverage is part of the core options of meson because it is not
listed in meson_options.txt, no? Documenting the switch is fine, but
it seems like we lack contents here. The paragraph describing
-Db_coverage links to regress-coverage, still this only has
instructions for ./configure. Shouldn't we have some docs to show one
how to achieve the same with meson? I'd guess that a separate section
for meson would make the most sense, for as long as we support both
methods in parallel.
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Meson tells nothing about that, for
one.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-02-22 08:24:37 | Re: Add missing meson arguments in docs |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2023-02-21 21:43:40 | Re: Row Level Security Execution within the SQL Evaluation Pipeline |