Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Date: 2023-02-09 00:07:49
Message-ID: Y+Q5VU4is3F1MUGF@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:30:32AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> In the last 30 days, only the following buildfarm animals have reported
> running the ssl checks on the relevant branches:
>
>  gokiburi
>  hachi

FWIW, these two ones are using OpenSSL 1.1.1, so that's fine.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-02-09 00:24:13 Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-02-08 23:56:24 Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15