From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Use pg_pwritev_with_retry() instead of write() in dir_open_for_write() to avoid partial writes? |
Date: | 2023-02-16 07:58:23 |
Message-ID: | Y+3iHyKFDAxp7kwI@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:00:00PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> The v3 patch reduces initialization of iovec array elements which is a
> clear win when pg_pwrite_zeros is called for sizes less than BLCKSZ
> many times (I assume this is what is needed for the relation extension
> lock improvements feature). However, it increases the number of iovec
> initialization with zerobuf for the cases when pg_pwrite_zeros is
> called for sizes far greater than BLCKSZ (for instance, WAL file
> initialization).
It seems to me that v3 would do extra initializations only if
pg_pwritev_with_retry() does *not* retry its writes, but that's not
the case as it retries on a partial write as per its name. The number
of iov buffers is stricly capped by remaining_size. FWIW, I find v3
proposed more elegant.
> FWIW, I attached v4 patch, a simplified version of the v2 - it
> initializes all the iovec array elements if the total blocks to be
> written crosses lengthof(iovec array), otherwise it initializes only
> the needed blocks.
+ static size_t zbuf_sz = BLCKSZ;
In v4, what's the advantage of marking that as static? It could
actually be dangerous if this is carelessly updated. Well, that's not
the case, still..
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2023-02-16 08:26:07 | RE: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
Previous Message | Ajin Cherian | 2023-02-16 07:54:15 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |