From: | Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-benchmarks(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Date: | 2005-01-09 03:16:33 |
Message-ID: | Xns95D8C5C3CEC15rr8xca@200.46.204.72 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-benchmarks |
"ycrevecoeur(at)nyc(dot)rr(dot)com" wrote in pgsql.benchmarks:
[sNip]
> It really depends on the job at hand.
>
> If this is for a super critical environment and the database is gonna
> get pounded really hard then go with Oracle if you have the budget
> otherwise PostgreSQL should do fine although Microsoft has nice
> development tools.
Unfortunately "nice development tools" has absolutely nothing to do
with "super critical" and "gonna get pounded really hard."
And with regards to the development tools, I actually find the
Microsoft tools not to my liking because they tend to keep the developer from
knowing what's really going on "under the hood" -- my preference is a
straight text editor to edit the source, compile/make, then see the results
(and only get into debugging as needed), thus fancy development tools are
mostly a waste of time for me (I'm happy with my text editor called "MEd").
> http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/20743
I'll take a look at that. Thanks for the link.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Randolf Richardson | 2005-01-09 03:20:15 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Previous Message | ycrevecoeur | 2005-01-08 22:12:26 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |