Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft

From: Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-benchmarks(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date: 2005-01-09 03:16:33
Message-ID: Xns95D8C5C3CEC15rr8xca@200.46.204.72
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-benchmarks

"ycrevecoeur(at)nyc(dot)rr(dot)com" wrote in pgsql.benchmarks:

[sNip]
> It really depends on the job at hand.
>
> If this is for a super critical environment and the database is gonna
> get pounded really hard then go with Oracle if you have the budget
> otherwise PostgreSQL should do fine although Microsoft has nice
> development tools.

Unfortunately "nice development tools" has absolutely nothing to do
with "super critical" and "gonna get pounded really hard."

And with regards to the development tools, I actually find the
Microsoft tools not to my liking because they tend to keep the developer from
knowing what's really going on "under the hood" -- my preference is a
straight text editor to edit the source, compile/make, then see the results
(and only get into debugging as needed), thus fancy development tools are
mostly a waste of time for me (I'm happy with my text editor called "MEd").

> http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/20743

I'll take a look at that. Thanks for the link.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-benchmarks by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Randolf Richardson 2005-01-09 03:20:15 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Previous Message ycrevecoeur 2005-01-08 22:12:26 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft