From: | Woodchuck Bill <bwr607(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I resign as the promoter of the PostgreSQL groups. |
Date: | 2004-11-11 21:37:21 |
Message-ID: | Xns959EA906BD392bswr607h4@130.133.1.4 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
kmorgan(at)spamcop(dot)net (Kathy Morgan) wrote in
news:1gn31ro(dot)1o5r8tu1fi95j6N%kmorgan(at)spamcop(dot)net:
> Max <maxdl(at)adelphia(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I've seen these forged emails on the mailing list, plus a few
>> other colorfull ones. You should see that people on the list are not
>> completely against this idea, and they are not fooled by those forged
>> emails.
>>
>> PLEASE do not give up.
>>
>> What you are facing is an identity issue with the postgresql users.
>
> It's also quite likely, as Rebecca Ore said, that the forged emails
> really have nothing to do with the postgresql users. news.groups and
> its denizens have been under attack for the past several months by a
> troll who, among other things, forges offensive posts to groups
> affected by current proposals. I think he had taken a short vacation
> and is now back to again disrupt proceedings here by making life
> miserable for people discussing new groups.
Kathy and Rebecca are right. I just looked at the mailing list. The headers
are the same as those of the usual forger, and at least one person has
named one of the same suspects[1]. This is a disgrace.
Mike, please reconsider your position. Your second RFD looks really good,
and the 5 groups that you chose are right on the money. You are a good
proponent. You've taken all of the feedback into account, good and bad, and
implemented the appropriate changes. Don't let this kook thwart your
efforts.
[1] Message-ID: <87r7n0g6r4(dot)fsf(at)stark(dot)xeocode(dot)com>
--
Bill
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wayne Brown | 2004-11-11 21:39:36 | Re: comp.database.postgresql.* |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-11 21:14:20 | Re: DROP DATABASE, but still there |