Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted.

From: Woodchuck Bill <bwr607(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted.
Date: 2004-11-06 19:21:57
Message-ID: Xns959973A3D41DBbswr607h4@130.133.1.4
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote in news:2v4mbfF2i3beoU1(at)uni-
berlin.de:

> Since we have the discussion going, someone mentioned that the group name
> should be comp.databases.postgresql. I think this is a good name and I'd
> like to see what everyone thinks of it.

Much better, especially if you are only proposing a single newsgroup in the
hierarchy. Use of the word "general" is unnecessary, and cumbersome.

--
Bill

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Wertheim 2004-11-06 20:00:02 Trying to get postgres to use an index
Previous Message Mike Cox 2004-11-06 19:11:09 Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted.