From: | Dmitry Samersoff <dms(at)wplus(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Duane Currie <dcurrie(at)sandman(dot)acadiau(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Threads |
Date: | 1999-08-03 14:37:57 |
Message-ID: | XFMail.990803183757.dms@wplus.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03-Aug-99 Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>> As well, a few have been asking about multi-threading.
>> Any thoughts?
I completly agree with Thomas.
Mutiprocess server is also more convenient
for managing and more portable
>
> Threads within a client backend might be interesting. imho a
> single-process multi-client multi-threaded server is just asking for
> trouble, putting all clients at risk for any single misbehaving one.
> Particularly with our extensibility features, where users and admins
> can add functionality through code they have written (or are trying to
> write ;) having each backend isolated is A Good Thing.
>
> istm that many of the cases for which multi-threading is proposed (web
> serving always comes up) can be solved using persistant connections or
> other techniques.
>
> - Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
> South Pasadena, California
---
Dmitry Samersoff, dms(at)wplus(dot)net, ICQ:3161705
http://devnull.wplus.net
* There will come soft rains ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-08-03 14:47:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version |
Previous Message | Ansley, Michael | 1999-08-03 14:35:35 | RE: [HACKERS] Threads |