Re: [HACKERS] Threads

From: Dmitry Samersoff <dms(at)wplus(dot)net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Duane Currie <dcurrie(at)sandman(dot)acadiau(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Threads
Date: 1999-08-03 14:37:57
Message-ID: XFMail.990803183757.dms@wplus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 03-Aug-99 Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>> As well, a few have been asking about multi-threading.
>> Any thoughts?

I completly agree with Thomas.

Mutiprocess server is also more convenient
for managing and more portable

>
> Threads within a client backend might be interesting. imho a
> single-process multi-client multi-threaded server is just asking for
> trouble, putting all clients at risk for any single misbehaving one.
> Particularly with our extensibility features, where users and admins
> can add functionality through code they have written (or are trying to
> write ;) having each backend isolated is A Good Thing.
>
> istm that many of the cases for which multi-threading is proposed (web
> serving always comes up) can be solved using persistant connections or
> other techniques.
>
> - Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
> South Pasadena, California

---
Dmitry Samersoff, dms(at)wplus(dot)net, ICQ:3161705
http://devnull.wplus.net
* There will come soft rains ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-08-03 14:47:24 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version
Previous Message Ansley, Michael 1999-08-03 14:35:35 RE: [HACKERS] Threads