to text or not to text

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: to text or not to text
Date: 1999-03-22 23:41:22
Message-ID: XFMail.990322184122.vev@michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


The docs say that the text type is the "Best choice" of the character data
types. It was always my understanding that the text type was stored else-
where in the database and a pointer to it was stored in the actual table.
Does PostgreSQL do this or is a more efficient way been found? It seems
that it'd be too expensive to store it elsewhere. I'm making some changes
to a table and wanted to optomize it (varchar vs text).

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taral 1999-03-22 23:53:59 Re: [HACKERS] optimizer and type question
Previous Message Erik Riedel 1999-03-22 23:27:15 optimizer and type question