From: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | (PostgreSQL-development) <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] OR clause status report - working |
Date: | 1998-07-31 19:12:13 |
Message-ID: | XFMail.980731151213.vev@michvhf.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 31-Jul-98 Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> On 31-Jul-98 Vadim Mikheev wrote:
>> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>>>
>>> Yep, it created it that time but still won't use it. :(
>>
>> Yes, I see.
>>
>> This is patch for 6.3.2
>> CVS updated.
>>
>
> campsites=> explain select * from locations where lower(city) = 'oxford';
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
>
> Index Scan using lower_city on locations (cost=3608.95 size=56600
> width=32)
>
> EXPLAIN
> campsites=>
>
>
> Much better! Thanks! Now I get to upgrade the production machine.
Ok, everything's working now but I did run into something unexpected.
The test machine (actually my desktop) has been running the cvsup'd
version since I set ip up a couple of weeks ago. The production machine
was running 6.3. The INSTALL file says dumping the db wasn't necessary
yet I had to - it wouldn't run without it and complained about the older
database. Is dumping going to be required for 6.4?
Also are indexes working for floats when the query uses BETWEEN?
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Searchable Campground Listings http://www.camping-usa.com
"There is no outfit less entitled to lecture me about bloat
than the federal government" -- Tony Snow
==========================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maarten Boekhold | 1998-07-31 19:23:10 | User authentication bug? |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1998-07-31 18:21:39 | Re: postgreSQL foreign key constraint |