From: | Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: j2ee compatiable jdbc driver on jdbc.postgresql.org? |
Date: | 2001-10-29 17:55:20 |
Message-ID: | XFMail.20011029105520.ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 29-Oct-2001 Gunnar Rnning wrote:
> Well, it used to be right(I evaluated castor 1.5 years ago). The main author
> of Castor definitely had a patched version of pgsql version that were pending
> inclusion at the time.
Yes, that's true. But the patched version of the JDBC driver was because of
bugs that caused Castor problems. The patches I submitted awhile back to the
JDBC list (that are in 7.2b1) are the ones they used to create that version.
Castor works with 7.1 and above, but until 7.2b1, they needed their 'fixed'
JDBC driver.
In fact, one of my goals has been to get Castor not having to distribute a
patched version of the JDBC driver. The other is to help postgresql support
the RETURNING clause. (So, we can do something like "insert into table
person('name') values('fred') returning id" which would help sequence numbers
within Castor, and be really cool. :-)
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE73ZgIiysnOdCML0URAsPyAJoD9Yqn9q7IhjUIhlKDzCpy1hDpuQCdEWpm
uHl0K85TVRvtDJ7Yo6vjrLY=
=6foS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nick Fankhauser | 2001-10-29 18:11:22 | Re: Urgent problems with my conection |
Previous Message | Gunnar Rønning | 2001-10-29 17:41:37 | Re: j2ee compatiable jdbc driver on jdbc.postgresql.org? |