From: | Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? |
Date: | 2001-08-24 19:50:41 |
Message-ID: | XFMail.20010824125041.ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
last_oid() works for me. I have no specific concern on the exact name, just
the functionality. (Call it fred() if you like. :-)
On 24-Aug-2001 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Ned Wolpert writes:
>
>> Sounds like there aren't objections to my requested function,
>> get_last_returned_oid(). I'm going to work on the function call for
>> postgres this weekend.
>
> Please don't name functions get_*. All functions "get" something.
>
> Btw., if you call get_last_returned_oid() and then call it again, do you
> get the "last returned oid" returned by get_last_returned_oid? The
> "returned" needs to be revised. last_oid should be sufficient.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7hrARiysnOdCML0URAtv/AJ9UmsbpbA4M6VVOYD90LMrV0FelTwCcCo/r
+aMk4VQ11xWYktgbBWCyOM0=
=qQry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-24 19:51:23 | Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-24 19:44:26 | Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-24 19:51:23 | Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-24 19:44:26 | Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |