Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

From: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...
Date: 2001-08-21 21:37:05
Message-ID: XFMail.20010821143705.ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> it should interact with ON INSERT rules for views. Search the pghackers
> mailing list archives for details. At this point I think it's probably

Ugh... a quick search shows me asking this same thing in May, when the 'big
TODO' list was being commented on. Now that I remember, I thought that the
RETURNING clause was being implemented. I didn't realize there wasn't
agreement on it.

I need to pay more attention to what I write. :-)

Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>

D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7gtSBiysnOdCML0URAtXNAJ4+W3AgpEk5QZM5IKCFFMQ2tGP5UQCeM1Lx
TXQw4pL4ew65B1iH+EfmZhk=
=Ho0k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2001-08-21 21:47:44 Signals blocked during auth
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-21 21:31:55 Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Finn 2001-08-21 21:41:22 Comparing fixed precision to floating
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2001-08-21 21:34:32 Re: Data types