Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol
Date: 2020-12-18 01:18:45
Message-ID: X9wDdc187M9BCBXK@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 03:13:25PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On second thought, I'm going to retract this patch. The docs[1] say:
>
> "You can, if you like, add comments to a history file to record your
> own notes about how and why this particular timeline was created. Such
> comments will be especially valuable when you have a thicket of
> different timelines as a result of experimentation."

This actually rings a bell. Now that I think about it, I have seen in
the past Japanese customers making use of Japanese characters in
history files. I am adding Fujii-san and Horiguchi-san in CC for more
details as I recall that they were involved in such things, with
pg_rman coming first into mind. (No idea about French users.)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-18 01:48:31 Re: Fail Fast In CTAS/CMV If Relation Already Exists To Avoid Unnecessary Rewrite, Planning Costs
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-18 01:01:22 Re: Proposed patch for key managment