Re: Proposed patch for key managment

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date: 2020-12-16 00:36:22
Message-ID: X9lWho7MUmppfVO0@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:09:09PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Yeah, looking at what's been done there seems like the right approach to
> me as well, ideally we'd have one set of APIs that'll support all these
> use cases (not unlike what curl does..).

Ooh... This is interesting. What did curl do wrong here? It is
always good to hear from such past experiences.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-12-16 00:45:17 Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on the fly
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-16 00:30:36 Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol