| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on the fly |
| Date: | 2020-12-12 00:16:34 |
| Message-ID: | X9QL4maC1b89F2my@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 05:27:03PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> By the way-- What did you think of the idea of explictly marking the
> types used for bitmasks using types bits32 and friends, instead of plain
> int, which is harder to spot?
Right, we could just do that while the area is changed. It is worth
noting that all the REINDEX_REL_* handling could be brushed. Another
point that has been raised on a recent thread by Peter was that people
preferred an hex style for the declarations rather than bit shifts.
What do you think?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2020-12-12 00:41:25 | Re: please update ps display for recovery checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-12-11 23:59:51 | Re: please update ps display for recovery checkpoint |