From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on the fly |
Date: | 2020-12-03 07:12:53 |
Message-ID: | X8iP9cFW8xdqmQsr@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:30:08PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Good idea. I think you mean like this.
Yes, something like that. Thanks.
> +typedef struct ReindexParams {
> + bool concurrently;
> + bool verbose;
> + bool missingok;
> +
> + int options; /* bitmask of lowlevel REINDEXOPT_* */
> +} ReindexParams;
> +
By moving everything into indexcmds.c, keeping ReindexParams within it
makes sense to me. Now, there is no need for the three booleans
because options stores the same information, no?
> struct ReindexIndexCallbackState
> {
> - int options; /* options from statement */
> + bool concurrently;
> Oid locked_table_oid; /* tracks previously locked table */
> };
Here also, I think that we should just pass down the full
ReindexParams set.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2020-12-03 07:18:16 | RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-12-03 07:02:55 | Re: convert elog(LOG) calls to ereport |