From: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Setting PG-version without recompiling |
Date: | 2014-07-03 15:54:05 |
Message-ID: | VisenaEmail.8e.793040bdcbd63e18.146fcbb2cbb@tc7-on |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
På torsdag 03. juli 2014 kl. 16:16:01, skrev Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
<mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>>: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> writes:
> Hi. �� I'm up for testing 9.4 but my JDBC-driver fails to connect due to
PG's
> minor-version string: "4beta1". Is it possible to set this somewhere without
> recompiling PG?
No, and even if you could, that would be the wrong approach. The right
approach is to fix the JDBC driver to not complain about such version
strings. I'm a bit surprised they haven't done so long since, considering
how long PG beta versions have been tagged like that. For that matter,
they really ought not complain about strings like "9.5devel" or
"9.5alpha2" either.
regards, tom lane I'm using the pgjdbc-ng driver, I'm sure the "official"
driver handles this. The driver will be fixed (the issue has a pull-request), I
just wondered if there was a magic know I could use until the PR is merged. --
Andreas Jospeh Krogh CTO / Partner - Visena AS Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andreas(at)visena(dot)com <mailto:andreas(at)visena(dot)com> www.visena.com
<https://www.visena.com> <https://www.visena.com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2014-07-03 17:36:24 | Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-07-03 15:51:36 | Re: docs: additional subsection for page-level locks in explicit-locking section |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Schlichtherle | 2014-07-04 08:10:48 | Connection.setsavepoint() / releaseSavepoint() is not thread-safe |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-03 14:16:01 | Re: Setting PG-version without recompiling |